Skip to content

Google Photos

7 alternatives - 2 easy, 4 medium, 1 hard

Google Photos reduced free storage to 15GB shared across all Google services. These self-hosted photo management apps let you store unlimited photos on your own hardware with AI-powered search, face recognition, and mobile backup.

Why people leave Google Photos

  • Storage limits reduced from unlimited to 15GB shared
  • Privacy concerns with AI scanning all photos
  • No local/offline access to full library
  • Vendor lock-in makes export painful

Comparison

AppDifficultyRAMDockerMobileStatus
Ente

End-to-end encrypted photo storage and sharing with official self-hosting docs and excellent mobile apps.

medium2GBiOS & Android Active
Immich

Stable self-hosted photo/video backup with mobile apps, ML-powered search, and facial recognition.

medium4GBiOS & Android Active
LibrePhotos

Self-hosted photo management with automatic grouping, face recognition, and geolocation.

hard4GB- Active
Lychee

Simple, lightweight photo management and sharing platform.

easy0.5GB- Active
Nextcloud Memories

Fast photo timeline, albums, maps, and mobile-friendly gallery experience for Nextcloud.

medium1GB-iOS & Android Active
PhotoPrism

AI-powered photo management with face recognition and auto-categorization.

medium2GB- Active
Piwigo

Mature self-hosted photo gallery and album management platform for collections, teams, and communities.

easy0.5GB- Active

Detailed Look

EnteTop Pick

End-to-end encrypted photo storage and sharing with official self-hosting docs and excellent mobile apps.

Pros

  • + End-to-end encrypted by default
  • + Excellent native mobile apps for iOS and Android
  • + Automatic photo backup from phone
  • + Self-hosted server option with documented quickstart
  • + Clean modern interface

Cons

  • - Self-hosting setup is more complex than Immich
  • - Fewer AI features than Immich or PhotoPrism
  • - Smaller self-hosting community
  • - Some hosted-service features may need extra configuration when self-hosted

Immich

Stable self-hosted photo/video backup with mobile apps, ML-powered search, and facial recognition.

Pros

  • + Excellent mobile app
  • + AI-powered search and face recognition
  • + Active development with frequent updates
  • + Supports RAW photos

Cons

  • - Heavy resource usage
  • - Major upgrades can still require careful migration
  • - Machine learning features need extra CPU/RAM or GPU resources

LibrePhotos

Self-hosted photo management with automatic grouping, face recognition, and geolocation.

Pros

  • + Face recognition and auto-grouping
  • + Geolocation mapping
  • + Timeline view
  • + Active development

Cons

  • - Heavy resource requirements
  • - Slower than Immich at indexing
  • - UI less polished than alternatives
  • - Initial setup is complex

Lychee

Simple, lightweight photo management and sharing platform.

Pros

  • + Very lightweight
  • + Simple and clean UI
  • + Easy to set up
  • + Good sharing features

Cons

  • - No mobile app
  • - No AI features
  • - Limited organization tools

Nextcloud Memories

Fast photo timeline, albums, maps, and mobile-friendly gallery experience for Nextcloud.

Pros

  • + Excellent upgrade for photo browsing inside Nextcloud
  • + Timeline, maps, albums, and mobile app support
  • + Good option for people already using Nextcloud storage

Cons

  • - Depends on a healthy Nextcloud installation
  • - Not a standalone photo server
  • - Advanced indexing can need tuning on large libraries

PhotoPrism

AI-powered photo management with face recognition and auto-categorization.

Pros

  • + Powerful AI classification
  • + Clean modern UI
  • + Good search capabilities

Cons

  • - Some features require Pro license
  • - No native mobile app for backup
  • - Slower indexing on large libraries

Piwigo

Mature self-hosted photo gallery and album management platform for collections, teams, and communities.

Pros

  • + Mature gallery workflow with albums, users, and plugins
  • + Good for publishing and organizing photo collections
  • + Lower resource needs than AI-heavy photo apps

Cons

  • - Less modern mobile backup experience than Immich or Ente
  • - UI and plugin quality can vary
  • - Not focused on ML search or face recognition

FAQ

What is the best self-hosted Google Photos alternative?

Immich is the most popular choice — it has excellent mobile apps, AI-powered search, face recognition, and a Google Photos-like experience. It requires 4GB RAM minimum but is under very active development.

Can I automatically back up my phone photos to a self-hosted server?

Yes. Immich has native iOS and Android apps with automatic background upload, similar to Google Photos. PhotoPrism can also receive uploads but requires a separate sync tool like Syncthing.

How much storage do I need for self-hosted photos?

A typical phone photo is 3-5MB. If you take 1,000 photos per year, that's about 3-5GB annually. A 2TB drive would store roughly 400,000-600,000 photos. RAW photos and videos will need significantly more space.

Can't decide? Compare Ente, Immich, LibrePhotos side by side →